melannen (
melannen) wrote in
common_nature2010-12-21 01:53 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
A Red Dragon is Eating the Moon
Liveblogging the 2010 North American Winter Solstice Lunar Eclipse. :D Lat 39 N, Long 76 W
Some notes of art: to follow the everybody-can-to-it theme of this community, these pictures were all taken in a suburban yard with a cheap EasyShare digital camera and no extra equipment. ...as a result, though, these images are really not a very good equivalent of what was visible through the naked eye - I had very limited ability to adjust exposure times and focal depth, so the short-exposure shots are far too dimmed out ( you could see a disc for almost the whole course of the eclipse) and the long-exposure shots are far too bright ( the slivers, especially, look much bigger in the photos than they did through eyes.) And, of course, in general it's much less sharp and I lost detail. But I am not going to say they aren't accurate, because a creature with eyes like an EasyShare camera would have seen pretty much this. :P
1:45 AM
2:00 AM

2:15 AM

2:23 AM

2:30 AM

2:35 AM

2:35 AM long-exposure
At this point I had to switch to longer exposure, nothing showed with short exposure. (Hence the sudden blurriness.)

2:40 AM
2:45 AM
(2:45 -> near-totality, break to thaw and post pictures.)
3:15 AM
(3:15 -> totality, break for fresh pomegranate and old brandy)
3:45 AM
4:00 AM
4:15 AM
-->4:30 AM Bed.
Some notes of art: to follow the everybody-can-to-it theme of this community, these pictures were all taken in a suburban yard with a cheap EasyShare digital camera and no extra equipment. ...as a result, though, these images are really not a very good equivalent of what was visible through the naked eye - I had very limited ability to adjust exposure times and focal depth, so the short-exposure shots are far too dimmed out ( you could see a disc for almost the whole course of the eclipse) and the long-exposure shots are far too bright ( the slivers, especially, look much bigger in the photos than they did through eyes.) And, of course, in general it's much less sharp and I lost detail. But I am not going to say they aren't accurate, because a creature with eyes like an EasyShare camera would have seen pretty much this. :P
1:45 AM
2:00 AM
2:15 AM

2:23 AM

2:30 AM

2:35 AM

2:35 AM long-exposure
At this point I had to switch to longer exposure, nothing showed with short exposure. (Hence the sudden blurriness.)

2:40 AM

2:45 AM

(2:45 -> near-totality, break to thaw and post pictures.)
3:15 AM

(3:15 -> totality, break for fresh pomegranate and old brandy)
3:45 AM

4:00 AM

4:15 AM

-->4:30 AM Bed.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Thank you for sharing these. I might see whether I can get some energy up later to try to take a photo when the partially eclipsed moon rises here in Sydney.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
that was great, thanks so much for freezing on our behalf!